Tag: reviews

  • WILLY WONKA AND THE CHOCOLATE FACTORY 1971 Movie Review – A critical analysis of mixing chocolate by waterfall

    Sometimes revisiting old classics can be scary. Was it actually good? Was it horrible? Watching through a critical lens may give you a very different opinion of a film on a rewatch. It turns out Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory WAS and IS excellent! It is a total masterpiece on many levels and a movie that any kid or adult would probably enjoy. What really stood out to me is that it is genuinely both funny and interesting throughout.

    First example of substantial funny: The scene where the scientist was asking his computer where the remaining golden tickets were located. I’m dyin’ laughing by the end of this scene. It was just a really funny bit they came up with that was basically like it’s own little stand alone skit. Another part I actually laughed at was when his teacher is calculating percentages based on how many chocolate bars each student opened. When Charlie reveals how many he opened, the teacher exclaims “Well I can’t figure out just two!”

    There are a number of other interesting things I noticed in my rewatch of Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory. One is that I think he reveals that the secret to his success is that he mixes his chocolate by waterfall. The problem with this is it looks to be an unsanitary way to make chocolate. Other scenes also make me suspicious that Wonka has built this difficult maze of rooms to move through solely for the purpose of warding off health inspectors.

    In a way, the plot eventually becomes: Is Willy Wonka good or evil? His actions are bizarre and he does not seem to be concerned for anyone’s safety. He blames the children for what they do wrong and takes no responsibility for himself. There are also these 4 moments that communicated to me that he is truly unhinged in some way:

    1: On the boat he shows them horror images, starts singing, transitions to poetry, then just screams. Oh, you were just joking, Willy? Heh heh, I guess?

    2: He makes the most out of place peculiar comment near the end of the film. “We are the music makers and we are the dreamers of dreams. Come along”

    3: “Stop. Don’t. Come back.” He appears to say sarcastically. OK, now you are not even trying to warn anyone properly of all the dangers.

    4: The objects in his study at the end are all just half an object. He must have purposefully split them in half as some kind of representation of himself. It’s as if he is half a person or feels like half a person, or maybe has some kind of split personality. I’m just throwing some ideas out there, but I think it conveys a very intimate place in his mind when we see the environment in his study at the end.

    Here’s where the film must be interpreted. The only information we have that the other kids were safe at the end is merely a statement from Wonka. We must take his word for it when he has already proven himself untrustworthy. After the credits roll, what happens next for the characters is one of two very different things. Either Charlie moves into the factory, the other kids are home safe, and everyone lives happily ever after OR Willy Wonka is now on the run as a criminal! Charlie and his family have trouble moving into their new home because it is a crime scene. Additionally, the factory is discovered to be an unsafe and unsanitary maze that is now a hazard to the city. I guess one other possibility is that Wonka gets off scot-free because of the contract he made everyone sign at the beginning. 

    The second interpretation makes me very sad for Charlie and his family so I choose to believe the good natured ending. But even so, Willy Wonka was still kind of evil for what he put everyone through wasn’t he?

    Final thoughts: 10/10 Crowns if you are overlooking the obvious problems from a modern day lens. I am giving it this high of a rating because I feel Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory’s quality level completely justifies the status it has as a top level classic. The movie is funny, exciting, fantastic, has great acting, has an enjoyable plot, and keeps you on edge the whole time trying to determine if Wonka is good/evil/sane/trustworthy. I don’t know if they intended the ending to be open to interpretation, but I don’t trust Willy Wonka’s word by the end of the film. It almost seems more likely that he’s an unhinged evil genius over an eccentric businessman, but each viewer must decide this for themselves!

  • I KNOW WHAT YOU DID LAST SUMMER 2025 Movie Review – Movie Explained

    Do you love stoopid movies? Because I love stoopid movies! Some examples include: The Master of Disguise, Bio-dome, Kangaroo Jack (actually the best movie, not sure why I wrote that), Batman and Robin, and Fast n Da Furious 63. The problem with I Know What You Did Last Summer (2025) is that it is NOT a stoopid movie! It is just a stupid movie.

    The only reason to go see I Know What You Did Last Summer is if you are someone that ABSOLUTELY MUST go to see any movie that has hooks. The only other reason I could think of is if you are a prahfezionnall movie critic like Dis Drawma Kingg. But back to the hooks, the primary focal point of the Last Summer franchise. I can only imagine what the creators/producers meeting in the 90’s might have looked like — 

    Person 1: [Desperately] That Scream movie is popular, but what could we possibly think of other than a mask of a ghost?

    Person 2: Yeah, like what would make us different? What would our hook be?

    Person 3: Oh me! Me! I got an idea! He uses a hook!

    Person 4: [Quietly] That’s a horrible idea…

    Person 5: [Loudly] Jonathan that’s perfect! I always knew you were a genius!

    Person 3: [Defeatedly] My name is Bob.

    Now, it could have ended that way with the room in fast agreement. Orrrrrrr perhaps after the hook was suggested they all went for lunch. When they came back, everyone was feeling kind of tired and ready to call it a day. Someone said “So we’re just going with the hook idea?” They all just REALLY wanted to go home when Person 2 stood up and said: 

    Person 2: If we leave now, I can pick up my daughter Little Mari Sue (full legal name) from daycare a little early so we can make it to our favorite ice cream shop before it closes.

    Person 5: [Loudly] Yeah let Little Mari Sue get some ice cream!

    Whole Room: [Triumphantly] YEAH!

    Creativity may have lost that day back in the 90’s, but Little Mari Sue got her favorite ice cream! So the universe had an inversely positive moment too! Now this is just what I choose to believe. I encourage everyone to believe whatever they want to believe. But if all of this is just my imagination, and Little Mari Sue didn’t even get any ice cream – then what did ANYONE get from the existence of the I Know What You Did Last Summer franchise?

    OK, I guess I’ll actually talk about what I liked and disliked about the movie. Praise all goes to the lead, Chase Sui Wonders. She was terrific! Her character was also the only one I found to be very likable. That was the problem with the film. The actors, characters, and the script were not any better than the first time around. Oh, actually there was one other great character – The Cure Disintegration t-shirt. Additionally, I did not find the motivations of each character to be very convincing (except for maybe The Cure t-shirt). SPOILER: A little into the movie it becomes very clear that it is really a sequel that just starts off feeling like a remake. It reminded me of this obscure movie from 2022 called Scream. I doubt the filmmakers knew about that one though.

    Movie Explained: Various events took place, often involving hooks. You may feel I am leaving out some details, but it’s not as many as you’d think!

    Final Thoughts: 2/10 Crowns. It gets such a low rating because I am rarely so bored in the theater. There just wasn’t much to like about it. If you are a long time reader (all month) of drawmakingg.com, then you may have noticed that most of my movie ratings are pretty low. It is true that I DO seek out bad movies. Bad movies are often very dramatic! Did you know that I’m into drama? A dramatic stoopid movie can be the highlight of my year! They can inspire you, make you laugh, even change your life! I Know What You Did Last Summer wasn’t one of these, but I assure you it CAN happen!

  • WHEN HARRY MET SALLY 1989 Movie Review – Ending Explained

    Harry n Sally waz just two people. Nuttin’ really special ‘bout ‘em. Yet they got a movie! It was a film about if a man and a woman could have a PLATONIC relationship. Suddenly CRASH BOOM BANG Harry and Sally fall into a hole and now they are in PLATO’S CAVE! This is what happened next:

    Harry: Well, hey there, Sally, all I see is shadows and stuff.

    Sally:  What’s the “and stuff”?! Sally asked incredulously.

               ALL I can see is shadows.

    Harry: Good point, good point. So whatcha doing for dinner Friday night, Sally?

    Sally:  DINNER?! She again asked incredulously.

               Can’t you see we’re STUCK IN A CAVE?! 

               How are we gonna get to MICKEY DEEZ or anywhere else for that matter?!

    Harry: What’s Mickey Deez? You mean that shadow on the cave wall with the arches?

    Sally:  Harry, do you honestly not remember our lives before we fell into the hole about an hour ago?

    Harry: We had lives before these cool cave shadows?

    Sally:  Oh my god why do I even BOTHER with you, Harry?

    And then believe it or not, those two fell in love with each other.

    Ending Explained: Harry and Sally fall in love. I had a hunch it was going to end this way a little past halfway into the movie but not too close to the end.

    Final Thoughts: 7/10 Crowns. I really liked When Harry Met Sally. You know, other than that weird part where they fell into the hole and started only seeing shadows for the rest of the movie. Also, the Drinking Bird was the best character despite a very small (but pivotal!) role in the film.

    Drawma Kingg Precognition states that many will disagree with my personal analysis of the events of When Harry Met Sally. I thought I was being very fair and critical based on the PhDs I don’t have. Was my review accurate to the movie? Dis Drawma Kingg wants you to tell us what YOU think in the comments!

  • THE PHANTOM 1996 Movie Review – A superhero that Slammed Evil before Batman and Superman

    Now I know some of you are thinking – “The Phantom doesn’t count as a classic!” OK, you win that argument. Moving on… This movie is one of my top 10 personal favorites. Wait, that doesn’t sound right. It’s gotta at least be in my top 5000 superhero movies of the last 30 years though. Yeah that sounds like the right category for it!

    Unlike most SO-CALLED PEOPLE, I like The Phantom. That is not even a joke or a lie. It holds a special place in my heart from the 90’s. However, I would be lying if I said I LOVED the movie or that it was a cinematic experience worth everyone’s time. But c’mon, with a tagline like “SLAM EVIL!” how could this movie go wrong?

    The character of The Phantom predates both Superman and Batman. He is a contender for the argument – “Who is the first superhero?” along with Zorro and some other costumed crime fighters. Who better to play him than Billy Zane?! it would probably be impossible to lead a movie with this many varying tones unless you were previously a cast member on Twin Peaks. Billy, Kristy Swanson, and Catherine Zeta-Jones are definitely the highlights of the film. The beginning of the movie is pretty rocky and lackluster, but it really picks up and becomes much more entertaining once Zane, Swanson, and Jones have their first scene together. Honestly, I think these actors could’ve carried this movie to a great place if there was a better director. I feel like the director must not have been a fan of the comic, because he did not seem to have a good vision of how to present this character on screen.

    What are some of the good things in this movie? My favorite scene is when Phantom’s doggie and horsey meet up in the forest, make some noises and gestures that show they can communicate with each other (horse-dog language), then go off on a hero/buddy mission to save Phantom and Buffy. Kristy Swanson’s character kicks a lotta butt, so we were one character name away from getting a Phantom/Buffy The Vampire Slayer superhero team up movie. There was also one scene where the director actually impressed me with the clever way he put it together. The villain does something very bad to another character, but it happens off screen. The dastardly act was just implied to the audience, which kind of made it MORE terrifying than actually showing what happened. This might have just been a way to avoid the censors, but it came across as artistic and well done.

    Ending Explained: Phantom explodes the bad guy.

    Final Thoughts: The Phantom is very close to having the components it needed to work. I think it would have succeeded with these improvements:

    1 – The costume didn’t look very good and desperately needed a redesign.

    2 – The cinematography was bad. Personally, I would have liked a darker atmosphere, but it definitely needed something different than what we got.

    3 – Different director, please!

    I really like the casting choices for the main characters. Catherine Zeta-Jones character particularly had a cool enemy turned ally arc. I thought she was perfect for this role. Unfortunately, a great cast can’t usually save a movie from a bad choice of director. But hey, I’ll trade parallel universe great versions of The Phantom for the one with posters and merchandise that encourage you to “SLAM EVIL!”

    Nostalgia rating: 7/10 Crowns

    Critical rating: 4 or 5 out of 10 Crowns