DRAWMA KINGG Movie Reviews

Author: drawmakingg

  • ACE VENTURA: PET DETECTIVE 1994 Movie Review – Ending Explained

    HELP! Dis Drawma Kingg is still trapped in the 3rd dimension since last episode! I have been looking around, and I cannot find a doorway out. OLACKIUS GLONGAR MAEPO MALORPA! See! Obviously I am not in my original dimension, because it still won’t let me tell you the secret code. More importantly, I’m trying to write a review of Ace Ventura: Pet Detective, but how will I get out of the 3rd dimension in time to do so?

    If only I were a pet walrus or giraffe or something. Maybe then, a pet detective could come find me in the 3rd dimension and take me home. Isn’t Ace Ventura the kind of guy that can transcend space and time? He better be, because all these new colors and geometric patterns are scaring me. 

    Must…write…movie…review…about…pet…detective. Dis Drawma Kingg thinks he has only seen this movie one time many years ago. I wasn’t sure if it would be any good from a 2026 lens. Jim Carrey’s delivery on his lines and a handful of the visual gags held up decently. Some of the other jokes and sentiments in the movie do not hold up well at all. These cringe moments may have even been obvious when it first came out. Hey, I’m actually critiquing a movie! Does that mean I am back in the 1st dimension?

    Ending Explained: The detective finds the pet.

    Final Thoughts: 6.5/10 Crowns. I am having difficulty figuring out if I only enjoy Ace Ventura for the childhood nostalgia factor. It definitely had me laughing at several parts though. Jim Carrey has such an undeniably strong presence in every scene. His ability to perform in front of the camera is incredible. I sure hope I made it back to my regular dimension. I will be even more upset than the reader if this 3rd dimension stuff goes on for yet another episode!

    Is there an overly drawmatic kingg stuck in the 3rd dimension? Will he ever be able to write again?

    Find out in the next weekly episode of drawmakingg.com !!!

  • RETURN TO SILENT HILL 2026 Movie Review – Does He Go Back There?

    Yeah, I’m probably gonna go back there. To Silent Hill? That place is dangerous! Yes, I must return. Bro, going there is like the absolute worst decision any sensible human being could make. That’s true, yet I highly doubt I am the only person to make this decision. In Return To Silent Hill, the main character does go back there.

    As Dis Drawma Kingg writes this review, dimensions shift, and I am now in another dimension where it is exactly the same, except I have 2 extra pieces of paper. How terrible my original dimension looks now by comparison! You may be thinking that I could just go to the store and get some of them 2 pieces of paper packs. You’re probably right. However, in this new dimension I am already having them.

    I’m back in the regular dimension, so I have to hurry up and tell you what I actually thought about Return To Silent Hill. The first half seemed a perfectly fine retelling of the video game story, just with small changes. The only problem I had thus far – I was already aware of the plot from the video game. Sometimes when I know the plot already, I find it hard to get lost in a film. That can make it hard to judge exactly how good a movie is.  At first, I welcomed any changes to the source material just so I could be surprised. I even liked the new plot line about how Mary got her illness. Changes near the end made this version of the story a bit worse for me though. For instance – the reason why James did the horrible thing that he did. I won’t even dignify it by spoiling it for you, but I felt this iteration attempted to make James look a little bit less horrible. Overall, I didn’t hate the movie. I definitely think it should have been longer in order to expand on some of the characters, particularly Maria and Eddie.

    Oh no the dimension shifted again, and I believe I am in a third dimension, except in this one I don’t even have the extra 2-pack of paper. Additionally, I am not a famous movie reviewer! Oh wait, isn’t that the same in the regular dimension? Now I don’t know if I’m in a third dimension or if I’m back in my original dimension! I’ll just have to stay observant and see if I notice anything out of place.

    Final Thoughts: 7/10 Crowns. That might be a little generous at 7 Crowns. Return To Silent Hill actually warrants at least two watches. Now that I know the movie doesn’t end the way I would have preferred, I need to watch it again to see if I can just appreciate it for what it is. I thought they did an excellent job recreating the areas in the video games, and I liked the artsy version of the main character, James. I would say one of its main strengths is that it has a lot of scary creatures – if that’s the sort of thing the viewer looks for in horror movies. Quickly, before I go, I have to tell you an important secret code. OLACKIUS GLONGAR MAEPO MALORPA. OH NO! It won’t let me tell you the secret code! DIS DRAWMA KINGG MUST BE TRAPPED IN THE THIRD DIMENSION!

  • 28 YEARS LATER: THE BONE TEMPLE 2026 Movie Review – Why Did You Give Me That Sandwich?

    Why did you give me that sandwich? It was not a tasty sandwich. In my review of the third 28 Later movie in 2025, I complained that 28 Years Later would have been better without the intro and outro scenes about the Jimmy character. The rest of the movie had nothing to do with him and was really good! I deemed these intro/outro scenes – Da Sandwich! Well here we are in the sequel. What’s the point of this Jimmy character? Why did they make 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple? Was Da Sandwich created for a reason?

    The short answer is – not a very good one. You might say there were some good fixins in Da Sandwich though. Ralph Fiennes’ acting was exceptional, and his character was surprisingly likable. He seemed to have a love for music such as Duran Duran and Iron Maiden. I think I heard him say “Memento Mori” at the end which is the name of a Depeche Mode album too. I don’t think the writers were actually using it that way, but for the official cannon story I create in my overly drawmatic head, it was definitely a Depeche Mode reference!

    Otherwise, I found the movie so-so. There were plot threads that fizzled. One example: there were multiple conversations about the Teletubbies, but nothing was concluded on the matter. There was also an intriguing, yet unresolved, sub plot about an infected patient that Dr. Ian Kelsen (Ralph Fiennes) was treating. I thought this was going to go somewhere really exciting during the climax. Unfortunately, it did not.

    Why Did You Give Me That Sandwich?: I think the previous movie created Da Sandwich just to try to turn 28 Later into a bigger franchise with notable characters. However, SUPER SPOILER: neither Dr. Ian Kelsen nor Jimmy appear to make it out alive. So this franchise expansion kinda implodes in the end.

    Final Thoughts: 6/10 Crowns. Da Sandwich should have set up something a little better than 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple. At this point, I am very lukewarm on all four of the 28 Later movies. I’ll still probably go see the next one though. Apparently mediocrity doesn’t stop me from giving movie franchises more money.

  • THE DRAWMA KINGG THEME SONG

    Today’s episode is THE DRAWMA KINGG THEME SONG!

    This is now the official song of drawmakingg.com

    Enjoy!